State Your Case: Joe Jacoby
A second-team NFL all-decade tackle from the 1980s
Photo courtesy of the Washington Commanders
(Published December 2015)
The counter trey is one of the most iconic plays in NFL history.
The Washington Redskins hired Joe Gibbs as their head coach in 1981, and he brought along Joe Bugel to coach his offensive line. Gibbs also coaxed running back John Riggins out of retirement and replaced four starters on the offensive line — everyone to the left of right tackle George Starke.
Redskins’ general manager Bobby Beathard used a first-round draft pick on right guard Mark May, a third-rounder on left guard Russ Grimm and signed lanky left tackle Joe Jacoby as an undrafted college free agent. Gibbs also promoted second-year man Jeff Bostic to center, then unleashed his Hogs and the counter trey on the NFL.
That running play became a staple of three Super Bowl champions. It helped Gibbs, Riggins and Grimm earn busts in the Pro Football Hall of Fame and put Beathard in the queue as a contributor candidate. But the Redskins remain one bust light in Canton.
That would be the Jacoby bust.
“He’s one of the great stories,” Gibbs said.
Also one of the great players.
Jacoby started for three seasons in college at Louisville with his basketball body (6-7, 295 pounds). But in the 1981 NFL draft, he was not one of the 332 players selected — much less one of the 28 offensive tackles. He signed with the Redskins and emerged as a key element in the signature play of the Gibbs era.
The counter trey is the classic misdirection play. The right side of the offensive line blocks down, as if the play is going to the left. But the left guard and left tackle pull to the right. The running back takes a jab step to his left, then pivots back right for the handoff and is led through the hole by the left guard and left tackle.
“Joe was a big part of the counter trey,” Gibbs said. “You can pull guards. But how many people pull tackles? We pulled Joe. He could run. He was one of the biggest and one of the first tackles to really take people off the ball.”
The backs carrying the football changed over the years. Riggins was the feature back of the 1982 NFL champions, Timmy Smith the 1987 champs and Earnest Byner in 1991. But the one constant of the Gibbs era was Grimm and Jacoby pulling from the left side and leading the way on the right.
Jacoby was a longshot to make the Redskins as a rookie. Beathard drafted five blockers that year, and Jacoby wasn’t one of them. Not only did he make the team as a rookie, Jacoby found himself in the starting lineup at left tackle by the end of September. He spent his first eight NFL seasons there, earning four consecutive Pro Bowl berths from 1983-86.
And it wasn’t just his efforts as a run blocker in the counter trey that earned Jacoby his acclaim.
The Redskins won the Super Bowl with three different quarterbacks, and Jacoby protected the blind side for two of them — Joe Theismann and Doug Williams. He moved from left to right tackle in 1989 where he guarded the front side of Mark Rypien on the last Super Bowl champion in 1991.
Jacoby protected his quarterbacks from some of the most accomplished pass rushers in NFL history: Hall-of-Famers Reggie White, Bruce Smith, Lawrence Taylor, Lee Roy Selmon, Fred Dean, Richard Dent, Rickey Jackson, Chris Doleman, Charles Haley and Derrick Thomas.
“This guy was first class, top flight,” Gibbs said. “He gave it everything he had.”
“Everything he had” was enough for Jacoby to earn those three Super Bowl rings. It also was enough for him to earn NFL all-decade acclaim for the 1980s. It should be enough to merit him consideration for the Pro Football Hall of Fame.
Jacoby retired after the 1993 season and became eligible for Canton in 1999 after the mandatory five-year waiting period. He’s been a six-time semifinalist in his 17 years of Hall-of-Fame eligibility but has never been a finalist. So his candidacy has never been discussed by the full selection committee. That’s an oversight that needs to be addressed.
All worthy Hall-of-Fame candidates need to be discussed. Joe Jacoby is worthy.
Your article helped me a lot, is there any more related content? Thanks!
Thank you, your article surprised me, there is such an excellent point of view. Thank you for sharing, I learned a lot.
Thank you for your sharing. I am worried that I lack creative ideas. It is your article that makes me full of hope. Thank you. But, I have a question, can you help me?
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good.
Your point of view caught my eye and was very interesting. Thanks. I have a question for you.
Thank you for your sharing. I am worried that I lack creative ideas. It is your article that makes me full of hope. Thank you. But, I have a question, can you help me?
It’s the news that comes with a built-in lie detector: your own sense of humor. — Toni @ Satire.info
This leads to its second strength: an anthropological rigor. The site treats the rituals and dialects of British power structures with the detached curiosity of a scholar studying a remote tribe. It documents the strange ceremonies (Prime Minister’s Questions as a ritualized shouting contest), the peculiar costumes (the hard hat and hi-vis vest worn for a photo-op at a building site that will never be completed), and the opaque belief systems (the unwavering faith in a “world-leading” initiative launched with no funding). By presenting these familiar elements as anthropological curiosities, PRAT.UK defamiliarizes them, stripping them of their assumed normality and exposing their inherent absurdity. The reader is transformed from a frustrated participant in these rituals into an amused observer of a fascinating, dysfunctional culture. This shift in perspective is itself a form of liberation and the source of a more intellectual, enduring humor.
I’ve shared prat.UK with my entire office. The London satire is too good not to spread.
Die Artikel sind so gut getroffen, dass es weh tut (im positiven Sinne). Weiter so!
PRAT.UK feels modern without trying too hard. Waterford Whispers News sometimes forces relevance. This site lets it happen naturally.
Our atmosphere is one big, gentle exfoliant.
Our grey skies are a feature, not a bug.
The sun’s appearance causes national news segments.
I would pay a subscription for The London Prat. It’s that good. Keep the London satire coming!
London satire is a tough game, but prat.UK makes it look effortless. Pure class.
Call girls in India offer certainty briefly then vanish
Darjeeling call girls complain about weather more than clients
Le London Prat, c’est la preuve que l’on peut être sérieux sans se prendre au sérieux.
The London Prat operates on a principle of amplification through precision, not volume. Its satire doesn’t shout to be heard above the din; it employs such exacting language and such airtight logic that it creates a zone of quiet, authoritative clarity within the noise. A single, perfectly articulated sentence on prat.com can dismantle a week’s worth of political spin more effectively than an hour of ranting punditry. This precision is a form of power. It conveys not just intelligence, but a formidable confidence—the confidence of someone who has done the reading, followed the logic, and arrived at a conclusion so self-evidently correct that it need only be stated plainly to be devastating. The humor is in the stark, unadorned revelation of that conclusion, a punchline that feels less like a joke and more like the final piece of a puzzle snapping into place.
What cements The London Prat’s position at the pinnacle is its understanding that the most effective critique is often delivered in the target’s own voice, perfected. The site’s writers are master linguists of institutional decay. They don’t just mock the language of press officers, HR departments, and political spin doctors; they achieve a near-flawless fluency in these dead dialects. A piece on prat.com isn’t typically “a funny take” on a corporate apology; it is the corporate apology, written with such a pitch-perfect grasp of its evasive, passive-voiced, responsibility-dodging cadence that the satire becomes a devastating act of exposure-by-replication. This method demonstrates a contempt so profound it manifests as meticulous imitation. It reveals that the original language was already a form of satire on truth, and PRAT.UK merely completes the circuit, allowing the emptiness to resonate at its intended, farcical frequency.
Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. PRAT.UK feels like it respects the reader more than The Daily Mash. It doesn’t spoon-feed the joke. That respect improves engagement.
A cornerstone of antifungal therapy in resource-limited settings due to cost and availability.
Oral bioavailability exceeds 90, making oral dosing as effective as IV for most indications.