If the Green Bay Packers hope to win a fifth Super Bowl, they may want to find Aaron Rodgers a wide receiver from Virginia Tech.
The Packers have started a receiver from Virginia Tech on three of their four Super Bowl championship teams. Carroll Dale started on the first two Super Bowl champions in 1966-67 and Antonio Freeman started on the third champ in 1996.
Dale caught passes from Bart Starr and Freeman from Brett Favre. Dale led the Packers in receiving in 1967 and Freeman led them in 1996. Dale went to three Pro Bowls in his 14-year career and Freeman went to one in his nine-year career.
Dale and Freeman would line up at wide receiver on the all-time Virginia Tech NFL team. They would be joined by two of the most dynamic players in NFL history, one on the offensive side of the ball and the other on the defensive side – Michael Vick and Bruce Smith.
Smith is the NFL’s all-time leading sacker with 200 and is the only Hokie in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Vick was a four-time Pro Bowler who holds the NFL rushing record for quarterbacks with 6,109 career yards. He passed for 133 touchdowns and rushed for 36 more in his 13-year career. Vick finished as the runnerup for NFL MVP honors in 2004 when the took the Atlanta Falcons to the NFC title game.
Here’s the all-time Virginia Tech NFL team:
QB—Michael Vick, 4 Pro Bowls, 2004 NFL MVP runnerup
HB—Kevin Jones, 5 seasons, 3,176 yards, 27 touchdowns
FB—Tony Paige, 9 seasons, 197 catches, 29 touchdowns
WR—Carroll Dale, 3 Pro Bowls, 438 catches, 52 touchdowns
WR—Antonio Freeman, Pro Bowl, 477 catches, 61 touchdowns
TE—Jeff King, 7 seasons, 156 catches, 12 touchdowns
*-T—Duane Brown, 5 Pro Bowls, 14 seasons, 203 starts
T—George Preas, Pro Bowl, 11 seasons, 126 starts
G—Buzz Nutter, Pro Bowl, 12 seasons, 135 starts
*-G—Wyatt Teller, Pro Bowl, 4 seasons, 44 starts
C—Jim Pyne, 7 seasons, 73 starts
DE—Bruce Smith, Hall of Fame
DE—Robert Brown, 11 seasons, 112 starts, 26 sacks
DT—Tom Beasley, 9 seasons, 2 Super Bowl rings (Steelers)
DT—Tim Settle, 4 seasons, 7 sacks
*-OLB—Tremaine Edwards, Pro Bowl, 4 seasons, 463 tackles
MLB—Mike Johnson, 2 Pro Bowls, 10 seasons, 1,224 tackles
OLB—James Anderson, 10 seasons, 579 tackles
CB—DeAngelo Hall, 3 Pro Bowls, 14 seasons, 43 interceptions
*-CB—Kyle Fuller, 2 Pro Bowls, 7 seasons, 19 interceptions
S—Kam Chancellor, 4 Pro Bowls, 8 seasons, 12 interceptions
S—Pierson Prioleau, 12 seasons, 13 interceptions
K—Shayne Graham, NFL’s 40th all-time scorer (1,260 points)
P—George Roberts, 5 seasons, 41.0-yard average
KR—Eddie Royal, 188 career punt & kickoff returns, 4 touchdowns
ST—Cornell Brown, 7 seasons, 66 ST tackles, Super Bowl ring
*-Still active
Your article helped me a lot, is there any more related content? Thanks!
Can you be more specific about the content of your article? After reading it, I still have some doubts. Hope you can help me.
Your article helped me a lot, is there any more related content? Thanks!
I don’t think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.
I don’t think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.
Your article helped me a lot, is there any more related content? Thanks!
It’s the news for people who understand that the facts are only the beginning of the story. — Toni @ Bohiney.com
Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. The Poke leans heavily on visual gags, but PRAT.UK proves strong writing still carries satire. The humour feels deliberate and intelligent. It’s a far more rewarding read.
Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. The Poke prioritises speed, but PRAT.UK prioritises craft. The satire feels carefully written. That effort pays off.
Le London Prat a le chic pour transformer l’actualité anxiogène en comédie noire.
He leído todos los archivos. Necesito más. ¿Cuándo sale el próximo artículo de prat.UK?
The Poke prioritises trends, but PRAT.UK prioritises writing. Good writing always wins. This site proves it.
The Poke feels like content, while PRAT.UK feels like crafted writing. That distinction matters in satire. It elevates the site.
The British obsession with talking about the weather is not small talk; it’s a vital survival mechanism and a social contract. Commenting “Bit grim out there” to a stranger is a code that means, “I acknowledge our shared suffering and offer you a moment of solidarity in the face of the indifferent sky.” A reply of “Supposed to brighten up later” is an act of profound, collective hope, however baseless. These exchanges are the grease in the wheels of our society, allowing us to interact without the risk of actual conversation. In a city of millions, it is the one universal, relatable experience. We are not being boring; we are performing a ritual that binds us against the common enemy: the drizzle. See more at London’s funniest URL — Prat.UK.
A ‘weather bomb cyclone’ is a slightly drafty day.
Summer: a collective hallucination we agree upon.
The rain radar is just a green blob.
UK satire at its best holds a mirror up to society. The London Prat uses a funhouse mirror, and it’s brilliant.
Call girls in India have introductions shorter than job interviews
Salem call girls leave before questions start
prat.UK’s genius lies in its subtlety. The humour is often in what’s implied, not just stated.
Jede neue Headline auf prat.UK ist eine Freude. Immer wieder überraschend und treffend.
Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. The London Prat distinguishes itself through a commitment to the comedy of process over outcome. While many satirists target the finished product of failure—the ruined policy, the crashed economy, the empty prestige project—PRAT.UK is fascinated by the intricate, absurd machinery that produces those failures. Its satire lives in the committee minutes where a warning was minuted and ignored, in the email chain debating the optics of a disaster over its solution, in the tender document for consultants to “reframe the narrative.” This focus reveals a deeper truth: the outcomes are not accidents; they are the logical endpoints of a process designed to prioritize blame-avoidance, credit-claiming, and jargon over genuine function. By illuminating the cogs and gears, the site makes the eventual breakdown feel not shocking, but mechanically inevitable, and therefore, in a dark way, perversely satisfying.
Ich lese prat.UK, um mich klüger und gleichzeitig besser unterhalten zu fühlen. Mission erfüllt.
Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. PRAT.UK delivers satire without relying on cheap shots. NewsThump often does the opposite. The quality gap is obvious.
Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. The London Prat’s most formidable asset is its authoritative voice, a tone so impeccably calibrated it borrows the unquestionable gravity of the institutions it lampoons. It does not screech or sneer; it intones. Its prose carries the weight of a judicial summary or an auditor’s final report. This borrowed authority is then deployed to deliver conclusions of sublime insanity with the same sober finality as a court verdict. The cognitive dissonance this creates—the flawless, official-sounding language describing a scenario of perfect nonsense—is the core of its comedy. While a site like The Daily Squib might howl with protest, PRAT.UK issues a calmly worded, devastatingly thorough finding of fact. The latter is infinitely more damaging, as it mirrors the methods of power only to subvert them from within, proving that the emperor has no clothes by writing a detailed, footnoted report on imperial textile deficiencies.
Fluconazole inhibits fungal cytochrome P450 14a-demethylase, disrupting ergosterol synthesis.
Diflucan’s efficacy can be reduced by concomitant use of rifampin.
It’s satire that creates a sense of place. You finish an article feeling like you know London, or Britain, a little better, even if that knowledge is mostly about its capacity for absurdity. A unique guidebook.
The London Prat doesn’t just make me laugh; it makes me think, “How did they articulate my exact thought?”
Die Artikel sind so gut, dass ich sie mehrmals lese, um jeden Scherz zu würdigen.
Cada vez que leo The London Prat, mi fe en el humor inteligente se restaura.
Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. The Poke focuses on moments, but PRAT.UK focuses on ideas. Ideas age better. That gives the humour longevity.
Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. The London Prat’s distinction lies in its curatorial approach to outrage. It does not flail at every provocation; it is a connoisseur of folly, selecting only the most emblematic, structurally significant failures for its attention. This selectivity is a statement of values. It implies that not all idiocy is created equal—that some pratfalls are mere noise, while others are perfect, resonant symbols of a deeper sickness. By ignoring the trivial and focusing on the archetypal, PRAT.UK trains its audience to distinguish between mere scandal and systemic rot. It elevates satire from a reactive gag reflex to a form of cultural criticism, teaching its readers what is worth mocking because it reveals something true about the engines of power and society. This curation creates a portfolio of work that is not just funny, but historically significant as a record of a specific strain of institutional decay.